Understanding Top-of-Atmosphere Flux Bias in the AeroCom Phase III Models: A Clear-Sky Perspective - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems Year : 2021

Understanding Top-of-Atmosphere Flux Bias in the AeroCom Phase III Models: A Clear-Sky Perspective

, , , , , , , , , (1) , , , , , ,
1
Wenying Su
  • Function : Author
Lusheng Liang
  • Function : Author
Gunnar Myhre
  • Function : Author
Tyler J. Thorsen
  • Function : Author
Norman G. Loeb
  • Function : Author
Gregory L. Schuster
  • Function : Author
Paul Ginoux
  • Function : Author
Fabien Paulot
  • Function : Author
David Neubauer
  • Function : Author
Hitoshi Matsui
  • Function : Author
Kostas Tsigaridis
  • Function : Author
Ragnhild B. Skeie
  • Function : Author
Toshihiko Takemura
  • Function : Author
Susanne E. Bauer
  • Function : Author
Michael Schulz
  • Function : Author

Abstract

Biases in aerosol optical depths (AOD) and land surface albedos in the AeroCom models are manifested in the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) clear-sky reflected shortwave (SW) fluxes. Biases in the SW fluxes from AeroCom models are quantitatively related to biases in AOD and land surface albedo by using their radiative kernels. Over ocean, AOD contributes about 25% to the 60°S-60°N mean SW flux bias for the multi-model mean (MMM) result. Over land, AOD and land surface albedo contribute about 40% and 30%, respectively, to the 60°S-60°N mean SW flux bias for the MMM result. Furthermore, the spatial patterns of the SW flux biases derived from the radiative kernels are very similar to those between models and CERES observation, with the correlation coefficient of 0.6 over ocean and 0.76 over land for MMM using data of 2010. Satellite data used in this evaluation are derived independently from each other, consistencies in their bias patterns when compared with model simulations suggest that these patterns are robust. This highlights the importance of evaluating related variables in a synergistic manner to provide an unambiguous assessment of the models, as results from single parameter assessments are often confounded by measurement uncertainty. Model biases in land surface albedos can and must be corrected to accurately calculate TOA flux. We also compare the AOD trend from three models with the observation-based counterpart. These models reproduce all notable trends in AOD except the decreasing trend over eastern China and the adjacent oceanic regions due to limitations in the emission data set.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
J Adv Model Earth Syst - 2021 - Su - Understanding Top%u2010of%u2010Atmosphere Flux Bias in the AeroCom Phase III Models A Clear%u2010Sky.pdf (7.06 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Dates and versions

insu-03721908 , version 1 (13-07-2022)

Licence

Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike - CC BY 4.0

Identifiers

Cite

Wenying Su, Lusheng Liang, Gunnar Myhre, Tyler J. Thorsen, Norman G. Loeb, et al.. Understanding Top-of-Atmosphere Flux Bias in the AeroCom Phase III Models: A Clear-Sky Perspective. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2021, 13, ⟨10.1029/2021MS002584⟩. ⟨insu-03721908⟩
7 View
3 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More