A global framework for the Earth: putting geological sciences in context - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Global and Planetary Change Year : 2018

A global framework for the Earth: putting geological sciences in context

(1, 2) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
1
2
Paul Byrne
  • Function : Author
Audray Delcamp
  • Function : Author
Pall Einarson
  • Function : Author
Oğuz Göğüş
  • Function : Author
Marie-Noëlle Guilbaud
  • Function : Author
Miruts Hagos
  • Function : Author
Szabolcs Harangi
  • Function : Author
Dougal Jerram
  • Function : Author
Liviu Matenco
  • Function : Author
Sophie Mossoux
  • Function : Author
Karoly Nemeth
  • Function : Author
Mehran Maghsoudi
  • Function : Author
Michael S. Petronis
  • Function : Author
Vladislav Rapprich
  • Function : Author
William I. Rose
  • Function : Author
Erika Vye
  • Function : Author

Abstract

We propose a global framework for the Earth system to facilitate communication between the geoscience community, the public and policy makers. Geoscience research aims to understand the history and evolution of the Earth system. This combines the non-living and living parts of the Earth, especially through interactions of the lithosphere, biosphere and atmosphere as well as the other parts of the system, such as the asthenosphere, core and extraterrestrial influences. Such research considers a system that spans scales from microscopic (micrometer scale) to megascopic (many 1000 s of km scale), and from milliseconds to millions of years. To connect different parts of this immense system, we habitually use a wide range of ad hoc geological frameworks, systems and geological environment models, where different processes and features operate and combine. In consequence, one way to judge the significance of our work, and to increase its value, is to assess how the elements studied are integrated within the whole Earth system. This allows us to see what implications any study has for this greater Earth system. To do this successfully, our research needs a standard global framework to assess a study's relevance. However, such a global framework does not formally exist, and so this article looks at existing examples and proposes one that can systematically place research into a global geological context. This proposed framework has the advantage of being useful for communicating geological processes to other disciplines, and can be used for any type of Earth (or planetary) environment. This framework is a fundamental tool for geoscience communication and for outreach, especially through geological heritage (geoheritage). Geoheritage concerns the valuing and protection of geoscience and geological sites, and is a vital tool for communicating geoscience. It can be used to communicate our knowledge of global change, providing, through landscapes and outcrops, a story that renders the concepts and advances of geoscience accessible. Like our basic research, the concept of geoheritage evolves as our understanding of the Earth progresses, and these dual changes can be explained with the global framework. Geoheritage is a global activity and it needs a global framework to put sites into context. A revision of the UNESCO geological thematic studies was called for by the World Heritage Committee in 2014 (decision: 38 COM 8B.11), and this can be done with the input from the full geoscience community using this global geological framework.

Thus, for research, geoscience policy and for geoheritage, a global framework is now needed. The proposed framework can place any site in its geological environment, related to its lithospheric plate tectonic setting and its history. The framework has a solid-earth bias (lithosphere), but includes all other spheres, such as the biosphere and anthropogenic activity. Extraterrestrial influences, like solar variations and metorite impacts are included. The framework is phenomenological, due to the necessity of grouping the features that we see, but these phenomena provide evidence of processes that we cannot see. The basic format is a table, a sketch of the Earth and a system diagram, three complementary and most powerful ways of depicting a system. A timeline, or stratigraphic column can be included, to show the evolution of geological history, and the table can be used as a 'game board' where one site migrates across from one set of conditions to another over time. The global framework allows any research site, area or subject to be set in the Earth's system, in a way that gives it context, allows comparisons and provides significance. We suggest that it can be a template for an internationally accepted version used to consolidate the necessary geoscience - geoheritage link and promote outreach.

For some researchers, such as Vernadsky (1926) the biosphere itself was also but an organic part of geological processes. Vernadsky went further to suggest 'noosphere', the sphere of thought that can be considered as an element of the anthroposphere, which has developed with the expansion of humans on planet Earth, and is now reaching other solar system bodies through space exploration.The Anthropocene (or for some the Anthropogene), the geological Era into which we may be moving is the geological time scale reflection of this (Gerasimov, 1979; Waters et al., 2014).

Dates and versions

insu-03708964 , version 1 (29-06-2022)

Identifiers

Cite

Benjamin van Wyk de Vries, Paul Byrne, Audray Delcamp, Pall Einarson, Oğuz Göğüş, et al.. A global framework for the Earth: putting geological sciences in context. Global and Planetary Change, 2018, 171, pp.293-321. ⟨10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.12.019⟩. ⟨insu-03708964⟩
5 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More