Global Carbon Budget 2021

Pierre Friedlingstein (1) , Matthew W. Jones , Michael O'Sullivan , Robbie M. Andrew , Dorothee C. E. Bakker , Judith Hauck , Corinne Le Quéré , Glen P. Peters , Wouter Peters , Julia Pongratz , Stephen Sitch , Josep G. Canadell , Philippe Ciais (2) , Rob B. Jackson , Simone R. Alin , Peter Anthoni , Nicholas R. Bates , Meike Becker , Nicolas Bellouin , Laurent Bopp (1) , Thi Tuyet Trang Chau (2) , Frederic Chevallier (2) , Louise P. Chini , Margot Cronin , Kim I. Currie , Bertrand Decharme (3) , Laique M. Djeutchouang , Xinyu Dou , Wiley Evans , Richard A. Feely , Liang Feng , Thomas Gasser , Dennis Gilfillan , Thanos Gkritzalis , Giacomo Grassi , Luke Gregor , Nicolas Gruber , Özgür Gürses , Ian Harris , Richard A. Houghton , George C. Hurtt , Yosuke Iida , Tatiana Ilyina , Ingrid T. Luijkx , Atul Jain , Steve D. Jones , Etsushi Kato , Daniel Kennedy , Kees Klein Goldewijk , Jürgen Knauer , Jan Ivar Korsbakken , Arne Körtzinger , Peter Landschützer , Siv K. Lauvset , Nathalie Lefèvre (4) , Sebastian Lienert , Junjie Liu , Gregg Marland , Patrick C. Mcguire , Joe R. Melton , David R. Munro , Julia E. M. S. Nabel , Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka , Yosuke Niwa , Tsuneo Ono , Denis Pierrot , Benjamin Poulter , Gregor Rehder , Laure Resplandy , Eddy Robertson , Christian Rödenbeck , Thais M. Rosan , Jörg Schwinger , Clemens Schwingshackl , Roland Séférian (3) , Adrienne J. Sutton , Colm Sweeney , Toste Tanhua , Pieter P. Tans , Hanqin Tian , Bronte Tilbrook , Francesco Tubiello , Guido R. van Der Werf , Nicolas Vuichard (2) , Chisato Wada , Rik H. Wanninkhof , Andrew J. Watson , David Willis , Andrew J. Wiltshire , Wenping Yuan , Chao Yue (2) , Xu Yue , Sönke Zaehle , Jiye Zeng (2)

1 LMD - Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539)
2 LSCE - Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette]
3 CNRM - Centre national de recherches météorologiques
4 ABC - Austral, Boréal et Carbone

Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize datasets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO₂ emissions (E_FOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (E_LUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO₂ concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate (G_ATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO₂ sink (S_OCEAN) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based data products. The terrestrial CO₂ sink (S_LAND) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (B_IM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the first time, an approach is shown to reconcile the difference in our E_LUC estimate with the one from national greenhouse gas inventories, supporting the assessment of collective countries' climate progress.

For the year 2020, E_FOS declined by 5.4 % relative to 2019, with fossil emissions at 9.5 ± 0.5 GtC yr^-1 (9.3 ± 0.5 GtC yr^-1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and E_LUC was 0.9 ± 0.7 GtC yr^-1, for a total anthropogenic CO₂ emission of 10.2 ± 0.8 GtC yr^-1 (37.4 ± 2.9 GtCO₂). Also, for 2020, G_ATM was 5.0 ± 0.2 GtC yr^-1 (2.4 ± 0.1 ppm yr^-1), S_OCEAN was 3.0 ± 0.4 GtC yr^-1, and S_LAND was 2.9 ± 1 GtC yr^-1, with a B_IM of -0.8 GtC yr^-1. The global atmospheric CO₂ concentration averaged over 2020 reached 412.45 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2021 suggest a rebound in E_FOS relative to 2020 of +4.8 % (4.2 % to 5.4 %) globally.

Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959-2020, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr^-1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO₂ fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use changes emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO₂ flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living data update documents changes in the methods and datasets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this dataset (Friedlingstein et al., 2020, 2019; Le Quéré et al., 2018b, a, 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2021 (Friedlingstein et al., 2021).

Domains: Sciences of the Universe [physics]

Pierre Friedlingstein, Matthew W. Jones, Michael O'Sullivan, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, et al.. Global Carbon Budget 2021. Earth System Science Data, 2022, 14, pp.1917-2005. ⟨10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022⟩. ⟨insu-03668388⟩