The Lunar Geophysical Network Landing Sites Science Rationale - INSU - Institut national des sciences de l'Univers Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue The Planetary Science Journal Année : 2022

The Lunar Geophysical Network Landing Sites Science Rationale

Heidi Fuqua Haviland
  • Fonction : Auteur
Renee C. Weber
  • Fonction : Auteur
Raphaël F. Garcia
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nicholas Schmerr
Seiichi Nagihara
  • Fonction : Auteur
Robert Grimm
  • Fonction : Auteur
Douglas G. Currie
  • Fonction : Auteur
Simone Dell'Agnello
  • Fonction : Auteur
Thomas R. Watters
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mark P. Panning
  • Fonction : Auteur
Catherine L. Johnson
  • Fonction : Auteur
Ryuhei Yamada
  • Fonction : Auteur
Martin Knapmeyer
Lillian R. Ostrach
  • Fonction : Auteur
Taichi Kawamura
Paul M. Bremner
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

The Lunar Geophysical Network (LGN) mission is proposed to land on the Moon in 2030 and deploy packages at four locations to enable geophysical measurements for 6-10 yr. Returning to the lunar surface with a long-lived geophysical network is a key next step to advance lunar and planetary science. LGN will greatly expand our primarily Apollo-based knowledge of the deep lunar interior by identifying and characterizing mantle melt layers, as well as core size and state. To meet the mission objectives, the instrument suite provides complementary seismic, geodetic, heat flow, and electromagnetic observations. We discuss the network landing site requirements and provide example sites that meet these requirements. Landing site selection will continue to be optimized throughout the formulation of this mission. Possible sites include the P-5 region within the Procellarum KREEP Terrane (PKT; (lat: 15°; long: -35°), Schickard Basin (lat: -44.°3; long: -55.°1), Crisium Basin (lat: 18.°5; long: 61.°8), and the farside Korolev Basin (lat: -2.°4; long: -159.°3). Network optimization considers the best locations to observe seismic core phases, e.g., ScS and PKP. Ray path density and proximity to young fault scarps are also analyzed to provide increased opportunities for seismic observations. Geodetic constraints require the network to have at least three nearside stations at maximum limb distances. Heat flow and electromagnetic measurements should be obtained away from terrane boundaries and from magnetic anomalies at locations representative of global trends. An in-depth case study is provided for Crisium. In addition, we discuss the consequences for scientific return of less than optimal locations or number of stations.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Fuqua_Haviland_2022_Planet._Sci._J._3_40.pdf (2.64 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

insu-03647553 , version 1 (20-04-2022)

Licence

Paternité

Identifiants

Citer

Heidi Fuqua Haviland, Renee C. Weber, Clive R. Neal, Philippe Lognonné, Raphaël F. Garcia, et al.. The Lunar Geophysical Network Landing Sites Science Rationale. The Planetary Science Journal, 2022, 3, ⟨10.3847/PSJ/ac0f82⟩. ⟨insu-03647553⟩
33 Consultations
31 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More