Response to Comment on "Early Archaean Microorganisms Preferred Elemental Sulfur, Not Sulfate"

P. Philippot; M. van Zuilen; K. Lepot; C. Thomazo; J. Farquhar; M. van Kranendonk

doi:10.1126/science.1151414

Journal articles

Response to Comment on "Early Archaean Microorganisms Preferred Elemental Sulfur, Not Sulfate"

P. Philippot ¹ M. van Zuilen ¹ K. Lepot ² C. Thomazo ¹ J. Farquhar ³ M. van Kranendonk ⁴

1 IPGP - Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris

2 IPGP - Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris

3 University of Maryland [College Park]

4 Geological Survey of Western Australia, 100 Plain Street, East Perth, WA 6004, Australia

Abstract : Our knowledge of the sulfur cycle on early Earth is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, there exist enough geochemical constraints from the rock record to show that the theoretical mixing models proposed by Bao et al. are highly unlikely to account for the range of d34S and D33S values recorded for the microscopic sulfides at the North Pole

Document type :

Journal articles

Domain :

Sciences of the Universe [physics]

Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-02525845
Contributor : Eva Fareau <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, March 31, 2020 - 11:03:52 AM
Last modification on : Friday, June 12, 2020 - 5:38:05 PM

Response to Comment on "Early Archaean Microorganisms Preferred Elemental Sulfur, Not Sulfate"

Links full text

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Export

Metrics

37

Response to Comment on "Early Archaean Microorganisms Preferred Elemental Sulfur, Not Sulfate"

Links full text

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Export

Share

Metrics

37