Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

The Cyclostratigraphy Intercomparison Project (CIP): consistency, merits and pitfalls

Matthias Sinnesael 1, * David de Vleeschouwer 2 Christian Zeeden 3 Sietske J. Batenburg 4 Anne-Christine da Silva 5 Niels J. de Winter 1 Jaume Dinarès-Turellh 6 Anna Joy Drury 7 Gabriele Gambacorta 8 Frederik J. Hilgen 9 Linda A. Hinnov 10 Alexanbder J.L. Hudson 11 David B. Kemp 12 Margriet Lantink 9 Jifi Laurin 13 Mingsong Li 14 Diederik Liebrand 7 Chao Ma 15 Stephen R. Meyers 16 Johannes Monkenbusch 17 Alessandro Montanari 18 Theresa Nohl 19 Heiko Pälike 2 Damien Pas 9 Micha Ruhl 20 Nicolas Thibault 17 Maximilian Vahlenkamp 2 Luis Valero 21 Sébastien Wouters 5 Huaichun Wu 22 Philippe Claeys 1 
Abstract : Cyclostratigraphy is an important tool for understanding astronomical climate forcing and reading geological time in sedimentary sequences, provided that an imprint of insolation variations caused by Earth’s orbital eccentricity, obliquity and/or precession is preserved (Milankovitch forcing). Numerous stratigraphic and paleoclimate studies have applied cyclostratigraphy, but the robustness of the methodology and its dependence on the investigator have not been systematically evaluated. We developed the Cyclostratigraphy Intercomparison Project (CIP) to assess the robustness of cyclostratigraphic methods using an experimental design of three artificial cyclostratigraphic case studies with known input parameters. Each case study is designed to address specific challenges that are relevant to cyclostratigraphy. Case 1 represents an offshore research vessel environment, as only a drill-core photo and the approximate position of a late Miocene stage boundary are available for analysis. In Case 2, the Pleistocene proxy record displays clear nonlinear cyclical patterns and the interpretation is complicated by the presence of a hiatus. Case 3 represents a Late Devonian proxy record with a low signal-to-noise ratio with no specific theoretical astronomical solution available for this age. Each case was analyzed by a test group of 17-20 participants, with varying experience levels, methodological preferences and dedicated analysis time. During the CIP 2018 meeting in Brussels, Belgium, the ensuing analyses and discussion demonstrated that most participants did not arrive at a perfect solution, which may be partly explained by the limited amount of time spent on the exercises (∼4.5 hours per case). However, in all three cases, the median solution of all submitted analyses accurately approached the correct result and several participants obtained the exact correct answers. Interestingly, systematically better performances were obtained for cases that represented the data type and stratigraphic age that were closest to the individual participants’ experience. This experiment demonstrates that cyclostratigraphy is a powerful tool for deciphering time in sedimentary successions and, importantly, that it is a trainable skill. Finally, we emphasize the importance of an integrated stratigraphic approach and provide flexible guidelines on what good practices in cyclostratigraphy should include. Our case studies provide valuable insight into current common practices in cyclostratigraphy, their potential merits and pitfalls. Our work does not provide a quantitative measure of reliability and uncertainty of cyclostratigraphy, but rather constitutes a starting point for further discussions on how to move the maturing field of cyclostratigraphy forward.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [97 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Isabelle Dubigeon Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, June 22, 2020 - 3:16:27 PM
Last modification on : Friday, August 5, 2022 - 12:35:04 PM


Publication funded by an institution


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NoDerivatives 4.0 International License



Matthias Sinnesael, David de Vleeschouwer, Christian Zeeden, Sietske J. Batenburg, Anne-Christine da Silva, et al.. The Cyclostratigraphy Intercomparison Project (CIP): consistency, merits and pitfalls. Earth-Science Reviews, Elsevier, 2019, 199, pp.102965. ⟨10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102965⟩. ⟨insu-02440391⟩



Record views


Files downloads