J. Aubert, J. M. Aurnou, and J. Wicht, The magnetic structure of convection-driven numerical dynamos, Geophysical Journal International, vol.172, issue.3, pp.945-956, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03693.x

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00365069

C. D. Beggan and K. A. Whaler, Forecasting change of the magnetic field using core surface flows and ensemble Kalman filtering, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.86, issue.18, pp.10-1029, 2009.
DOI : 10.1029/2009GL039927

J. Charney, R. Fleagle, H. Riehl, V. Lally, and D. Wark, The feasibility of a global observation and analysis experiment, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc, vol.47, pp.200-220, 1966.

U. R. Christensen and J. Aubert, Scaling properties of convectiondriven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields, Geophys, J. Int, vol.166, issue.1, pp.97-114, 2006.

U. R. Christensen and A. Tilgner, Power requirement of the geodynamo from ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos, Nature, vol.329, issue.6988, pp.429-169, 1038.
DOI : 10.1038/nature01560

U. R. Christensen and J. Wicht, Numerical Dynamo Simulations, Core Dynamics, pp.245-281, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/b978-044452748-6.00134-6

U. R. Christensen, P. L. Olson, and G. Glatzmaier, Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: a systematic parameter study, Geophysical Journal International, vol.138, issue.2, pp.393-409, 1999.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1999.00886.x

U. R. Christensen, A numerical dynamo benchmark, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, vol.128, issue.1-4, pp.25-34, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0031-9201(01)00275-8

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00498652

U. R. Christensen, J. Aubert, and G. Hulot, Conditions for Earth-like geodynamo models, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol.296, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.009

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00540375

C. C. Finlay, International geomagnetic reference field: the eleventh generation, Geophys. J. Int, vol.183, issue.3, pp.1216-1230, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00527822

A. Fournier, C. Eymin, and T. &alboussì-ere, A case for variational geomagnetic data assimilation: insights from a one-dimensional, nonlinear, and sparsely observed MHD system, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, vol.14, issue.2, pp.163-180, 2007.
DOI : 10.5194/npg-14-163-2007

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00145920

A. Fournier, An Introduction to Data Assimilation and Predictability in Geomagnetism, Space Science Reviews, vol.65, issue.3, pp.247-291, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11214-010-9669-4

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00565056

E. Friis-christensen, H. Lühr, and G. Hulot, Swarm: A constellation to study the Earth???s magnetic field, Earth, Planets and Space, vol.388, issue.2, pp.351-358, 2006.
DOI : 10.1186/BF03351933

N. Gillet, V. Lesur, and N. Olsen, Geomagnetic Core Field Secular Variation Models, Space Science Reviews, vol.122, issue.1, pp.129-145, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11214-009-9586-6

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00565057

G. Glatzmaier and P. H. Roberts, A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, vol.91, issue.1-3, pp.63-75, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0031-9201(95)03049-3

G. Glatzmaier and P. H. Roberts, A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal, Nature, vol.377, issue.6546, pp.377-203, 1995.
DOI : 10.1038/377203a0

G. Hulot and J. Le-mouël, A statistical approach to the Earth's main magnetic field, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, vol.82, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0031-9201(94)90070-1

G. Hulot, N. Olsen, and T. Sabaka, The present field, in Geomagnetism, pp.33-75, 2007.

G. Hulot, N. Olsen, E. Thébault, and K. Hemant, Crustal concealing of small-scale core-field secular variation, Geophys, J. Int, vol.177, issue.2, pp.361-366, 2009.

G. Hulot, C. C. Finlay, C. G. Constable, N. Olsen, and M. Mandea, The Magnetic Field of Planet Earth, Space Science Reviews, vol.138, issue.3, pp.159-222, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11214-010-9644-0

G. Hulot, F. Lhuillier, and J. Aubert, Earth's dynamo limit of predictability, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.83, issue.6, pp.10-1029, 2010.
DOI : 10.1029/2009GL041869

A. Jackson, A. R. Jonkers, and M. R. Walker, Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol.358, issue.1768, pp.358-957, 1768.
DOI : 10.1098/rsta.2000.0569

A. Kageyama, T. Sato, R. Horiuchi, T. Hayashi, Y. Todo et al., Computer simulation of a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. II, Physics of Plasmas, vol.2, issue.5, pp.1421-1431, 1995.
DOI : 10.1063/1.871485

E. Kalnay, Atmospheric predictability and ensemble forecasting, in Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability, pp.205-260, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/cbo9780511802270.007

M. Korte and C. G. Constable, Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K, Geochem, Geophys. Geosyst, pp.10-1029, 2005.

W. Kuang, A. Tangborn, W. Jiang, D. Liu, Z. Sun et al., MoSST_DAS: the first generation geomagnetic data assimilation framework, Commun. Comput. Phys, vol.3, issue.1, pp.85-108, 2008.

C. Kutzner and U. R. Christensen, From stable dipolar towards reversing numerical dynamos, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, vol.131, issue.1, pp.29-45, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0031-9201(02)00016-X

C. Leith, Numerical simulation of the Earth's atmosphere, Methods in Computational Physics, pp.1-28, 1965.

F. Lhuillier, A. Fournier, G. Hulot, and J. Aubert, The geomagnetic secular-variation timescale in observations and numerical dynamo models, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.62, issue.10, pp.10-1029, 2011.
DOI : 10.1029/2011GL047356

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01410184

D. Liu, A. Tangborn, and W. Kuang, Observing system simulation experiments in geomagnetic data assimilation, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.75, issue.3, pp.10-1029, 2007.
DOI : 10.1029/2006JB004691

E. Lorenz, SECTION OF PLANETARY SCIENCES: THE PREDICTABILITY OF HYDRODYNAMIC FLOW*,???, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol.99, issue.II, pp.409-432, 1963.
DOI : 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1963.tb01464.x

E. Lorenz, Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol.20, issue.2, pp.130-141, 1963.
DOI : 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2

E. Lorenz, A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model, Tellus, pp.321-333, 1965.

S. Maus, L. Silva, and G. Hulot, Can core-surface flow models be used to improve the forecast of the Earth's main magnetic field?, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.138, issue.B7, pp.10-1029, 2008.
DOI : 10.1029/2007JB005199

Y. Mintz, Very long-term global integration of the primitive equations of atmospheric motion, WMO/IUGG Symposium on Research and F. Lhuillier, J. Aubert and G. Hulot Development Aspects of Long-Range Forecasting, pp.141-167, 1964.

P. L. Olson and U. R. Christensen, Dipole moment scaling for convection-driven planetary dynamos, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol.250, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.08.008

URL : http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-FB92-E

L. Silva, S. Maus, G. Hulot, and E. Thébault, On the possibility of extending the IGRF predictive secular variation model to a higher SH degree, Earth, Planets and Space, vol.62, issue.1, pp.62-815, 2010.
DOI : 10.5047/eps.2010.07.005

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01411847

A. Simmons, R. Mureau, and T. Petroliagis, Error growth and estimates of predictability from the ECMWF forecasting system, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol.109, issue.527, pp.1739-1771, 1995.
DOI : 10.1002/qj.49712152711

J. Smagorinsky, GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS, Monthly Weather Review, vol.91, issue.3, pp.99-164, 1963.
DOI : 10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2

J. Smagorinsky, Problems and promises of deterministic extended range forecasting, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc, vol.50, pp.286-311, 1969.