Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Testing climate models using an impact model: what are the advantages?

Marc Stéfanon 1 Nicolas K. Martin-Stpaul 1, 2 Paul Leadley 1 Sophie Bastin 3 Alessandro Dell’aquila 4 Philippe Drobinski 5 Clemente Gallardo 6
1 ESE - Ecologie Systématique et Evolution
2 URFM - Ecologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes
3 SPACE - LATMOS
LATMOS - Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales
4 ENEA Ente per le Nuove Technologie Energia e Ambiente, Centro Ricerche Casaccia
5 LMD - Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539)
6 ICAM - Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales [Toledo]
Abstract : Global and regional climate model (GCM and RCM) outputs are often used as climate forcing for ecological impact models, and this potentially results in large cumulative errors because information and error are passed sequentially along the modeling chain from GCM to RCM to impact model. There are also a growing number of Earth system modeling platforms in which climate and ecological models are dynamically coupled, and in this case error amplification due to feedbacks can lead to even more serious problems. It is essential in both cases to rethink the organization of evaluation which typically relies on independent validation at each successive step, and to rely more heavily on analyses that cover the full modeling chain and thus require stronger interactions between climate and impact modelers. In this paper, we illustrate the benefits of using impact models as an additional source of information for evaluating climate models. Four RCMs that are part of the HyMeX (Hydrological cycle in Mediterranean EXperiment) and Mediterranean CORDEX projects (MED-CORDEX) were tested with observed climatology and a process-based model of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) tree growth and forest ecosystem functioning that has been rigorously validated. This two part analysis i) indicates that evaluation of RCMs on climate variables alone may be insufficient to determine the suitability of RCMs for studies of climate-forest interactions and ii) points to areas of improvement in these RCMs that would improve impact studies or behavior in coupled climate-ecosystem models over the spatial domain studied.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas
https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01145966
Contributor : Catherine Cardon <>
Submitted on : Monday, April 27, 2015 - 1:57:57 PM
Last modification on : Monday, December 14, 2020 - 3:40:49 PM

Identifiers

Collections

INSU | CNRS | X | INRA | X-LMD | AGROPARISTECH | UPMC | ENS-PARIS | UVSQ | LMD | LATMOS | PARISTECH | ENPC-LMD | ENPC | X-DEP-MECA | SORBONNE-UNIVERSITE | SU-SCIENCES | INRAE | PSL

Citation

Marc Stéfanon, Nicolas K. Martin-Stpaul, Paul Leadley, Sophie Bastin, Alessandro Dell’aquila, et al.. Testing climate models using an impact model: what are the advantages?. Climatic Change, Springer Verlag, 2015, 131 (4), pp.649-661. ⟨10.1007/s10584-015-1412-4⟩. ⟨insu-01145966⟩

Export

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote

Share

Metrics

Record views

483