Impact of lithosphere deformation on stratigraphic architecture of passive margin basins
Abstract
The aim of this study is to revise our view of the long-term stratigraphic
trends of passive margins to include the impact of the coupling between
the lithosphere deformation and the surface processes. To do this, we
developed a new numerical procedure simulating interactions between
lithosphere deformation and (un)loading effects of surface processes
(erosion/sedimentation) in 3D with a special attention to the stratigraphic
architecture of the associated sedimentary basins.We first simulate
the syn-rift phase of lithosphere stretching by thermo-mechanical modeling.
We then use the resulting lithosphere geometry as input of a 3D
flexural modeling including coupling with surface processes to simulate
the post-rift evolution of the margin. We then use the resulting accumulation
and subsidence histories as input of the stratigraphic simulation to
model the detailed stratigraphic architecture of the basin. We tested this
procedure using synthetic examples of lithosphere stretching based on
different rheologies of the lithosphere (i.e. strength of the lower crust) in
the cases of narrow or ultrawide rifting.We determined the stratigraphic
expression of the conjugate margins and show that they differ in terms
of long-term stratigraphic trends, erosion/accumulation and lithological
distribution in space and time.
In all cases, uplift/subisdence rates decrease with time while the flexure
wavelength increases as isotherms are re-equilibrated. Some areas show
displacement inversion over time from uplift to subsidence (or viceversa).
As expected, the amplitude of vertical motion of the wide margin
cases is very limited with respect to the narrow margin case. Vertical
motions are very asymetric on conjugate margins. Accordingly, the
stratigraphic architectures and the sedimentation/erosion patterns of the
conjugate simulated margins are significantly different mostly because
the duration and length of progradation and retrogradation differ. We
evaluated the sensitivity of the simulations to parameters controlling (i)
the lithosphere deformation, (ii) the continental drainage erosivity (climate)
or (iii) erodability (lithology) as well as (iv) base level (eustasy).