. Marthelet, 1999) show that the most important negative Bingham, C., 1964. Distribution on a sphere and on the projective gravity anomaly is located in the west corner of the Pont-deplane

?. Montvert, G. L. Borne-pluton-borradaile, W. Keeler, C. Alford, and P. Sarvas, Anisotropy root. Moreover, the anomaly gradient is steeper along the of magnetic susceptibility of some metamorphic minerals, Phys. southern border than along the northern one, pp.161-166, 1987.

C. Caron, Hercynian orogenic belt is a Devonian?Carboniferous inférieur d'Europe méridionale, Traçage isotopique Pb-Pb des g??tesg??tes collision orogen between Gondwana and Laurussia After de l'Iglesiente (SW Sardaigne) et des Cévennes, Evolution du socle the main compression ceased in the Early Carboniferous in the encaissant par la géochronologie U-PB, Ar-Ar et K-Ar Relationship between granitic plutons (e.g The Au-Sb mineralization, Montpellier. extensional regime coincident with the emplacement of numerous coal, basin and structure of the Pont-de-Montvert?Borne pluton inferred from Villefort fault (French Massif Central ), p.547, 1991.

B. B. Ellwood and D. B. Wenner, Correlation of magnetic susceptibility with 18O: 16O data in orogenic granites of the southern with this interpretation, 1981.

M. Faure, X. Charonnat, A. Chauvet, M. Et-mattauer, and A. Etchecopar, Argumentation en faveur de chevauchements de type himalayen dans la cha??necha??ne hercynienne du e ´volution tectonique du domaine para-autochtone cévenol de la cha??necha??ne hercynienne (Massif Central français), Schéma structural, pp.261-267, 1976.
DOI : 10.1016/s1251-8050(99)80106-2

P. Matte, La cha??necha??ne varisque parmi les cha??nescha??nes paléozo?paléozo?¨ques 328, pp.401-407, 1986.

A. Fernandez, Sur la structure et la mise en place du granite péri-atlantiques, modèle d'e ´volution et position des grands blocs continentaux au Permo-Carbonifère, Bull. Soc. Géol. France C. R. Som. Soc. géol. France, vol.8, issue.3, pp.137-140, 1977.

J. Mialhe and J. W. Graham, Le massif granitique de la Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy, an unexploited petrofabric element, Borne (Cévennes) Geol. Soc. Am. Bull, vol.65, pp.1257-1258, 1954.

R. B. Hargraves, D. Johnson, C. Y. Chan, P. Monié, V. Bouchot et al., Distribution anisotropy: the cause of AMS in igneous rocks? Geophys. Res, pp.2193-2196, 1991.

F. Hrouda, Magnetic anisotropy of rocks and its application in French massif Central (Cévennes and Châtaigneraie) (abstract). geology and geophysics, Eur. Un. Geosci. Geophys. Surv, vol.10, issue.5, pp.477-514, 1982.

F. Hrouda and M. Chlupacova, The magnetic fabric in the Rakib, A., 1996. Le métamorphisme régional de basse pression des Cévennes occidentales: une conséquence directe de la mise en place Nasavrky Massif, Cas Mineral, Geol, vol.25, pp.17-27, 1980.

V. Jelinek, Characterization of the magnetic fabric of rocks. du dô me thermique vellave (Massif Central français, 1981.

M. A. Khan, P. Rochette, M. Jackson, and C. Aubourg, The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of some igneous and metamorphic rocks, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.103, issue.4, pp.2873-2885, 1962.
DOI : 10.1029/JZ067i007p02873

R. F. King, The magnetic fabric of some Irish Granites, Geological Journal, vol.63, issue.1, pp.209-226, 1966.
DOI : 10.1002/gj.3350050106

G. Marthelet, M. Diament, and C. Truffert, Un levé gravimétrique et les roches plutoniques du Mont Lozère, Ann. Fac. Sci. Clermont- Ferrand, issue.14, pp.31-32, 1999.

C. R. Détaillé-dans-le-cévennes-), . Acad, and . Sci, Low-field susceptibility anisotropy of some biotite crystals, Phys. Earth planet. Inter, vol.63, pp.85-97, 1990.